The story of Aspartame (Nutrasweet, Equal, Spoonful, and Equal-Measure) is interesting in how it was discovered, how it was approved for use, and how it remains on the market. Because of the many different reports of adverse reactions, we do not recommend its use, especially if you have any of the symptoms or conditions it has been linked to.
It often takes at least sixty days without any aspartame to see a significant improvement in any conditions it may be contributing to. Improvement in health is also often accompanied by weight loss. Check all labels very carefully (including vitamins and pharmaceuticals). Look for the word "aspartame" on the label and avoid it. (Also, it is a good idea to avoid "acesulfame-k" or "sunette.") Finally, avoid getting nutrition information from junk food industry PR organizations such as IFIC or organizations that accept large sums of money from the junk and chemical food industry such as the American Dietetic Association.
Adverse effects reported from short-term and/or long-term use
Seizures and convulsions, dizziness, tremors, migraines and severe headaches (triggered or caused by chronic intake), memory loss (common toxicity effect), slurring of speech, confusion, numbness or tingling of extremities, chronic fatigue, depression, insomnia, irritability, panic attacks (common aspartame toxicity reaction), marked personality changes, phobias, rapid heart beat (tachycardia - another frequent reaction), asthma, chest pains, hypertension (high blood pressure), nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, swallowing pain, itching, hives / urticaria, other allergic reactions, blood sugar control problems (e.g. hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia), menstrual cramps and other menstrual problems or changes, impotency and sexual problems, food cravings, weight gain, hair loss / baldness or thinning of hair, burning urination & other urination problems, excessive thirst or excessive hunger, bloating, edema (fluid retention), infection susceptibility, joint pain, brain cancer (in pre-approval studies on animals), death.
Aspartame Disease may mimic symptoms of, or worsen…
Fibromyalgia, arthritis, multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease, lupus, multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS), diabetes and diabetic Complications, seizures, Alzheimer's disease, birth defects, chronic fatigue syndrome, lymphoma, Lyme's disease, attention deficit disorder (ADD and ADHD), panic disorder, depression and other psychological disorders.
Products containing Aspartame
Instant breakfasts, breath mints, cereals, sugar-free chewing gum, cocoa mixes, coffee beverages, desserts, candies, juice beverages, laxatives, multivitamins, milk drinks, pharmaceuticals and supplements, shake mixes, soft drinks, tabletop sweeteners, tea beverages, instant teas and coffees, topping mixes, wine coolers, and yogurt amongst other things. Always read the label.
A documentary, Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, thoroughly examines the toxicity of aspartame. Sweet Misery starts with filmmaker and narrator Cory Brackett's moving story about how she discovered aspartame's effect on her health was affecting her fight with multiple sclerosis. Once she stopped using aspartame-sweetened products, her symptoms went away almost by magic. [News with Views July 6, 2004]
However, a sweeping review of research studies of aspartame says there is no evidence that the non-nutritive sweetener causes cancer, neurological damage or other health problems in humans
Looking at more than 500 reports, including toxicological, clinical and epidemiological studies dating from 1970's preclinical work to the latest studies on the high-intensity sweetener, along with use levels and regulations data, an international expert panel from 10 universities and medical schools evaluated the safety of aspartame for people of all ages and with a variety of health conditions. Their study is published in the September 2007 issue of Critical Reviews in Toxicology.
"There have been continued questions in the media and on the internet about the safety of aspartame," said panel member and University of Maryland food and nutrition professor Bernadene Magnuson. "Our study is a very comprehensive review of all of the research that's been done on aspartame. Never before has a group with the breadth of experience of this panel looked at this question."
The panel used the latest data -- 2001-02 -- from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) to determine the most current levels of aspartame consumption.
"Even the very highest consumers of aspartame are well below the acceptable daily intake (ADI) and well below the amounts used in animal testing," said Magnuson.
The team reviewed studies that tested a number of health effects of varying levels of aspartame, including amounts that far exceed the acceptable daily intake, on animals and humans. In addition to healthy adults and children, studies also looked at effects on adults and children with diabetes, hyperactive and sugar-sensitive children, and people with Parkinson's disease and depression.
The Expert Panel's evaluation concluded the following:
Aspartame is safe at current levels of consumption, which remain well below established ADI levels, even among high user sub-populations. No credible evidence was found that aspartame is carcinogenic, neurotoxic or has or any other adverse effects when consumed even at levels many times the established ADI levels.
* Based on results of several long term studies, aspartame does not have carcinogenic or cancer-promoting activity.
* Results of extensive investigation in studies that mimic human exposure do not show any evidence of neurological effects, such as memory and learning problems, of aspartame consumption.
* Overall the weight of the evidence indicates that aspartame has no effect on behavior, cognitive function, neural function or seizures in any of the groups studied.
* Aspartame has not been shown to have adverse effects on reproductive activity or lactation.
* Studies conclude that aspartame is safe for use by diabetics and may aid diabetics in adhering to a sugar-free diet.
* There is no evidence to support an association between aspartame consumption and obesity. On the contrary, when used in multidisciplinary weight control programs, aspartame may actually aid in long-term weight control.
* The studies provide no evidence to support an association between aspartame and brain or hematopoietic tumor development.
Products featuring Splenda can be labeled “natural” because of the FDA-approved claim that Splenda is made from sugar (an assertion disputed by the Sugar Association, which is suing Splenda's manufacturer, Johnson & Johnson). Splenda is the trade name for a new synthetic compound called sucralose, comprised of two molecules of sucrose (sugar) and three molecules of chlorine. While some industry experts claim the molecule is similar to salt, other independent researchers say it has more in common with pesticides.
There are no long-term studies of the side effects of Splenda in humans. But the manufacturer's own short-term studies showed that sucralose, the chemical name for Splenda, caused shrunken thymus glands and enlarged livers and kidneys in rodents.
Observational evidence shows that there are side effects of Splenda, including skin rashes/flushing, panic-like agitation, dizziness and numbness, diarrhea, muscle aches, headaches, intestinal cramping, bladder issues, stomach pain, bloating and gas (flatulence).
Splenda wants to shortcut any free speech or backlash to their product by registering all the negative domains. It all started back in the 90’s when AOLsucks.com successfully defended its use of the Trademark of “AOL” in its name and established the legal precedent (BTW, AOL bought AOLsucks years later). Courts have found that the sucks appended domain names do not confuse the consumer, and their registrants have a right to voice criticism. To proactively combated this, companies with big brands now find it common to register the domains before critics do. But when reading the list of domains that Johnson & Johnson registered it looks like they predict bad side effects or that their product may be dangerous. Creative names like Splenda Side Effects.com, Splenda Dangers.com, Splenda is not Safe.com, and Victims Of Splenda.com are thought up by the marketing team at Johnson & Johnson. It looks like J&J was late to the game because the more obvious negative domains are owned by critics like sucks and kills. However J&J decided to register the .NET versions instead. The cost of the domains is nothing compared to the legal or PR battles that could take place if a critic successfully uses the domain name. Large companies should make it a proactive practice to register negative domains while they are still in the branding phase of their product.
Johnson & Johnson owns:
Splenda Sucks.net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda Kills.net, .org, biz .info
Splenda Truth.com , .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda Poison.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
The Dangers of Splenda.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
The Facts About Splenda.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
The Splenda Dangers.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
The Splenda Facts.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Victims of Splenda.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
The Truth about Splenda.net, .org, .biz, .info
The Splenda Truth.com, .net, .org, ,biz, .info
Splenda Toxicity.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda Toxicity Center.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda Victims.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda and your Health.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda and your Family.com, .net, .org, .info, .biz
Splenda Myths.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda Alert.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda Facts.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda Safety.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Truth about Splenda.info, .biz
Splenda Side Effects.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
All about Splenda.net
Bitter truth about Splenda.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Facts about Splenda.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Myths about Splenda.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Official Splenda Site.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda Dangers.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda is not Safe.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
Splenda is not so Sweet.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info
The Truth about Splenda Safety.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info [from http://blog.domaintools.com/2007/03/splenda-registers-hundreds-of-negative-domains/]